You have licenses nobody's workflow depends on, a pilot that never generalized, and an adoption number nobody believes. When leaders say "we need help with AI," they usually mean: we spent money and nothing changed. Most failed AI deployments didn't fail on technology. They failed on decision rights, process ambiguity, and adoption — the human system. That is CATALIIST's home ground.
The six questions that actually need answering:
- 01Which of our workflows is worth changing first, and how do we know?
- 02What can be automated, what must stay human, and who decides?
- 03What does a working version look like — not a demo, a thing people use on Monday?
- 04How do we govern this without stopping it?
- 05How do we make it stick after the consultant leaves?
- 06How do we prove it worked?